Measuring the change in functional level of children rehabilitants with cerebral palsy: a brief report
Keywords:pediatric rehabilitation; icf; functioning; assessment
To compare Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM®), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Ashworth scale in their ability to discriminate larger and smaller benefits of rehabilitation. 248 children with cerebral palsy participated in an intensive rehabilitation intervention. Scores were assessed at admission and discharge. GMFCS and MACS scores did not change. Ashworth scale and FIM improved evenly in almost every rehabilitant. There were positive changes in GMFM scores of 233 rehabilitants with median pre/post difference 3.8 (range 0.4 to 29.2) points. While Ashworth scale, FIM, GMFCS, and MACS might be valuable tools to assess the level of functioning, they seemed to be too rough to describe mild changes observable during a short rehabilitation intervention. Comparing to them, GMFM scale seemed to be more sensitive in defining such changes.
Published articles are:
- Peer reviewed
- Immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download
- Permanently preserved in our online archive
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
You have to follow these terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Noncommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.